A Comparative Study of Disposable Agriculture Coveralls Based on Wearer Trials-Juniper Publishers
Agricultural workers require work wear that fits well and is
comfortable, durable, and protects from hazardous substances encountered in the
work place. In order to understand how garment style and design details affect
fitting, mobility, durability and protection, three styles of disposable
agricultural coveralls are compared through wearer trials. They include a
traditional disposable coverall from the market (Labeled as “B”), a modified
coverall from the same manufacturer with elastic panels in the back (Labeled as
“R”) and a design created by the researchers that incorporates pleated sections
(Labeled as "P). By analyzing the data of the wearer trials and wearers'
feedbacks, it was found that the pleat design in “P” style was the least
preferred in terms of fitting as the pleats were opened in stretch movements
and present a hindrance due to the fact that they did not lay flat. Instead,
users preferred the “R” style as the elastic panels under the arms and at back
provides adjustability for fitting.
To read more: Full text
For more Open access journals click on Juniper Publishers
For more articles click on Current Trendsin Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering
Comments
Post a Comment