A Comparative Study of Disposable Agriculture Coveralls Based on Wearer Trials-Juniper Publishers

Agricultural workers require work wear that fits well and is comfortable, durable, and protects from hazardous substances encountered in the work place. In order to understand how garment style and design details affect fitting, mobility, durability and protection, three styles of disposable agricultural coveralls are compared through wearer trials. They include a traditional disposable coverall from the market (Labeled as “B”), a modified coverall from the same manufacturer with elastic panels in the back (Labeled as “R”) and a design created by the researchers that incorporates pleated sections (Labeled as "P). By analyzing the data of the wearer trials and wearers' feedbacks, it was found that the pleat design in “P” style was the least preferred in terms of fitting as the pleats were opened in stretch movements and present a hindrance due to the fact that they did not lay flat. Instead, users preferred the “R” style as the elastic panels under the arms and at back provides adjustability for fitting.

To read more: Full text
For more Open access journals click on Juniper Publishers
For more articles click on Current Trendsin Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering- Juniper Publishers

A Review of Some Recent Breakthroughs in Medical Textiles Research- Juniper Publishers

Using Labels and Accessories as Creative Advertising 111 Media: Insights from Cannes Lions 2017-Juniper Publishers